Dec 03 2001

Healthcare for Women

Published by at 12:43 pm under Uncategorized

I know it’s really bad that I haven’t had a check-up, including a Pap test, in three years. Basically, since I no longer need a birth control prescription, I don’t go. My niece, on the other hand, at the wise old age of 19, had an appointment scheduled today for her very first Pap test. She lives in England. Here’s her e-mail to me describing what happened:

“You won’t believe this. I went to see the nurse today for my Pap test and she said she wouldn’t give me one because I’m too young. She said that I have to be 21 to have a Pap test and that when I’m due for it I’ll get a letter in the mail. You are basically only allowed a test if you’ve had the letter or you’ve been referred by your doctor because you’ve had some unusual discharge, etc. She also said you’re only allowed to have them every three years.”

Now, here’s a young woman who is trying to take care of herself and is being refused care by the national healthcare system (NHS). Apparently they are unaware that cervical cancer is a young woman’s disease — I know two women who got it, and they both got it before the age of 25. They both also discovered it through, you guessed it, their annual Pap test. And both women had it treated immediately, and years later, have no recurring symptoms. The American Cancer Society suggests that a woman start getting Pap tests at the age of 18, or upon becoming sexually active, whatever comes first. They further recommend that everyone, including me, get a Pap test once a year.

My sister Beth, who is my niece’s mother, asked her doctor about getting a mammogram when Beth was 37. That year, our mother had a radical mastectomy, and gave all three of her daughters the medical records, so Beth brought them with her when she met with her doctor. Her doctor told her that she couldn’t get a mammogram before the age of 50, no matter what her family history was. Compare that to what happened to me. I was 35 at the time. I went to my doctor with the same medical records, and she scheduled a mammogram for me that week. She said the guidelines in the US recommend getting a baseline mammogram before the age of 40, and having them every 1-2 years until the age of 50, when they should become annual. Given how bad my mother’s cancer was my doctor felt it was wiser to err on the side of caution, and I’m thankful for that. By the way…my Mom’s fine and has even finished her chemotherapy.

It just blows my mind that all English women, including my sister, are getting this kind of misinformation and poor medical treatment. Come to think of it, my niece’s boyfriend’s mother died of cervical cancer before the age of 40. Someone should get the message to these women that the English healthcare system is completely unacceptable. But what can they do, since the healthcare system is government-run?

pixelstats trackingpixel

5 responses so far

5 Responses to “Healthcare for Women”

  1. Babs (and her co-workers)on 03 Dec 2001 at 1:25 pm

    I just read your post to the ladies at work. They (like me) though it was absoultely NUTS!

    I’ve been getting mine on a yearly basis since I’ve been 16. I am now 23 and I go for colposcopies every 6 months to track my dysplacia(sp?). They’ve caught it early enough that hopefully it will never evolve into full blow cervical cancer.

    Lord only knows what kind of shape I’d be in they wouldn’t have caught this sooner.

    http://my.webmd.com/content/asset/adam_disease_cervical_dysplasia

    I think they should read the “Calling Your Health Care Provider ” section.

  2. Leson 03 Dec 2001 at 11:46 pm

    Be thankful you’re American with the worlds largest economy.

    The English health system is creaking for lack of funds despite tha fact we are one of the world’s richest nations.

    Think what the peoples of the poorer nations are living through.

  3. Candion 04 Dec 2001 at 6:48 am

    I also had dysplasia, and it was diagnosed at the age of 19. If I had waited until I was 21, I would have had cervical cancer. That poor girl. What a bunch of idiots.

  4. Suzyon 04 Dec 2001 at 7:30 am

    Babs, I hope you don’t mind — I moved your other comment over here!

    As far as the NHS goes, I would think it would be more cost-effective to prevent cancer, which requires such lengthy and expensive treatments and surgery, than to treat it after it is allowed to happen. I wonder why Canada, which is so big, is able to have a more effective government-sponsored healthcare system?

    And yes, America is a wealthy country, but our healthcare system, or what passes for it, is a disaster. I’m lucky that I’m covered through my job, but many people, like my sister Megan and her diabetic husband, aren’t. And it costs them a fortune just to keep him in insulin and testing strips. So it’s not that great over here, either. The class system in the US is those who have healthcare, and those who don’t.

  5. Babson 04 Dec 2001 at 12:14 pm

    Taxes. Lots and lots of taxes. I think that’s how Canada keeps a great health care system.

    I complain every month about the taxes that are taken out of my paycheque – then I read stories like this one and I’m truly thankful!

    And if they were to tell me to pay more taxes to get even better health care – to that I’d say “tax me, baby!”

    (and no problem for the comment move)